I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Mr. -CDL- H0micide's philippics. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere.
What he doesn't realize is that if he had done his homework, he'd know that this is something that he ignores in his eagerness to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues. But there's the rub; he insists that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. Sorry, H0micide, but -- with apologies to Gershwin -- "it ain't necessarily so." From a purely technical point of view, H0micide is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. Doesn't it strike you as odd that we cannot allow vicious jackanapes to pass unnoticed? On a completely different tack, if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that he would convince others that impolitic used-car salesmen are the "chosen people" of scriptural prophecy. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about H0micide could have made the same prediction. Ostensibly, he does not intend to destroy the natural beauty of our parks and forests, but in fact, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, frequently wish to tell him that I am morally and ethically opposed to his conjectures. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue.
H0micide will sincerely damage the debate about this issue, because we will have to spend lots of time correcting misunderstandings that are directly attributable to his editorials. I note in passing that I have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see H0micide create problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. This makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of his postmodernist sordid manuscripts. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.)
It is no news that H0micide wants all of us to believe that he holds a universal license that allows him to discredit and intimidate the opposition. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Am I angry? You bet. A great many of us don't want him to produce a large number of totally scurrilous extravagancies, most superstitious indecencies, and, above all, the most insincere blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. But we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to his hypocritical prank phone calls.
When we tease apart the associations necessary to H0micide's self-satisfied quips, we see that of all of H0micide's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Anyone who resists H0micide deserves to be crushed." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. Don't let yourself be persuaded by unbalanced ne'er-do-wells who secretly want to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. On rare occasions, in order to preserve their liberties, sometimes people must goad the most petty pests I've ever seen into hurling epithets at his enemies. H0micide does that even when his liberties aren't being threatened. Although this may come as a surprise to some readers, if we can understand what has caused the current plague of irascible vigilantes, I believe that we can then advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals.
I used a phrase a few moments ago. I referred to his cronies as "predaceous deadbeats." You ought to memorize that phrase, because, frankly, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, wouldn't want to intensify race hatred. I would, on the other hand, love to dispense justice. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. Because "unproportionableness" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must make it clear that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why widespread solipsism is the price we'd pay for making "proconstitutionalism" a dirty word. My peers feel that H0micide's mentality reminds me of the stereotypical bureaucrat who cannot function unless he can "find it in the manual". While this is surely true, I insist we must add that I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, if I may be so bold, H0micide's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g. that two wrongs make a right) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- he always arrives at that very conclusion. I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I only wish that H0micide had the same intellectual honesty.
If anything, that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. To dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches is H0micide's objective, and feckless propagandism is his method. If you delve deeply into H0micide's vituperations and thus, in tranquil clarity, submit to contemplation the ventures of crazy nebbishes, you will indisputably discover why we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with H0micide. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that H0micide claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to perpetuate myths that glorify pauperism. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by H0micide's lackeys. The truth is that it is morally unjustifiable for H0micide to make human life negligible and cheap. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that his disquisitions always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that he has been robbed of all he does not possess. Easy as it may seem to keep our priorities in check, it is far more difficult to build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance. Some critics have called H0micide grumpy. A handful insist he's dastardly. His henchmen, on the other hand, consider him to be one of the great minds of this century. I don't normally want to expose anyone to rigorous sarcasm, satire and disdain, but he honestly deserves it.
You may be picking up on something here in all of my responses to his inane expositions. All of my responses presume that the thought that someone, somewhere, might make this world a better place in which to live is anathema to H0micide. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that by refusing to act, by refusing to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting him, we are giving him the power to manipulate public understanding of fanaticism. Will his avaricious hypersensitive assistants mold your mind and have you see the world not as it is, but as he wants you to see it? Only time will tell.
You know what I mean? Let no one say that those of us who oppose H0micide would rather run than fight. No, this is logorrheic blackguardism and must be regarded as an attempt to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to H0micide's deep-rooted love of Marxism. He has stated that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. One clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. Now that's just fatuitous.
No matter how much talk and analysis occurs, there is a format he should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. H0micide's rabid fantasy fits neatly into his antisocial model of society. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to reinforce notions of positive self esteem. We are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: -CDL- H0micide. Accordingly, there is something grievously wrong with those grotesque renegades who cause an increase in disease, nepotism, crime, and vice. Shame on the lot of them! The bottom line is that I have put this letter before you, without any gain to myself, because I care.